Office of theProvost
Procedure for Applying for External Funding
Planning
The selkin [at] haverford.edu (Director of Sponsored Research) encourages you to contact them at the very beginning of your grant-seeking process, so that they can help you to strategize and to gain an overview.
The best sources for assistance on the academic content of your proposal are the program announcement, a program officer or even a reviewer if available, and your professional colleagues. Sometimes a funder will make available a list of previous recipients of funding; it may useful for you to contact one or more of them.
Please be aware that depending on the grant program and your circumstances, you may need to apply a year or more in advance of when you want the funds.
Do I need College approval?
For many federal funders, the College must submit your proposal on your behalf, subject to any program requirements or limitations concerning additional applications from other faculty members. In other cases, such as many foundations, you will submit the proposal yourself, but even in those cases, your proposal may include some document demonstrating College approval (often signed by the hc-aor [at] haverford.edu (subject: Seeking%20AOR%20Approval) (Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research)), or the funds will be administered by the College if you are successful. In all these cases (College submits or College provides approval form or College administers funds), you will need College approval of your proposal and should follow the timeline below.
In other cases, we still encourage you to contact us and follow the timeline below, to help you meet the program requirements and ensure that your plans are compliant with College policies.
Timeline for approval and submission
It is best to allow a few months for researching, writing, and reviewing your proposal, so that you can refine and reformulate your proposal in light of your developing agenda and the interests of your potential funders.
As the deadline approaches, please follow this timeline:
-
At least 4 weeks before deadline: inform the Director of Sponsored Research of your planned application, and discuss with the Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research any sabbaticals, course releases, or commitments by the college that are implied by your proposal.
Download our Budget Spreadsheet. You may also download and edit this simple Budget Justification form. The Director of Sponsored Research will review with you the requirements of the application and help you develop the budget.
Each program will have its own format for the budget. Even for programs that only require informal budgets, we may ask that you use the standard template linked above, since it simplifies both the budget approval process and your own process of budget development (it builds in key College parameters like fringe-benefit rates and performs most computations automatically).
-
At least 2 weeks before deadline: send budget and budget justification to the Grant and Contracts Accountant (with CC to the Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research and the Director of Sponsored Research) for Controller's Office review .
If a final draft of your budget and budget justification are not received this far in advance, we cannot guarantee that they will be reviewed and approved in time for your proposal to be submitted. If you are working with external partners, such as a prime awardee who would be subawarding us, then please set the budget deadline two weeks in advance of their deadline.
-
At least 3 days before deadline: send whole proposal (i.e., all the documents that will be submitted to the funding entity) to the Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research for review. For federal programs, file the certifications for disclosure of significant financial interests, lobbying, and other regulatory matters online; print, sign, scan, and send the Bayh-Dole Compliance form to the Director of Sponsored Research.
Your trainings on financial conflict of interest and responsible and ethical conduct of research (rcr or recr) of research will also need to be up to date, in particular if you are applying to a federal science agency.
Given this much lead time, we can ensure that the technical requirements of the application have been met and potentially give feedback on the core of your proposal. While this final review is ongoing, it is typically OK to make refinements to the academic content of your proposal, although if they impact the budget or College commitments, that will need review by the Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research.
-
At least 24 hours before deadline: get approval from the Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research to submit and be available to assist with submission. The Director of Sponsored Research typically submits proposals on behalf of the institution.
Many of the systems for electronic submission become slow and unreliable just before a deadline, so it is unwise to wait until the last few hours to submit.
Decisions
Many funders explain their decision-making process, so that you know when to expect notification of whether or not you have won an award. It often takes at least six months.
If you gain funding, congratulations! Please notify the selkin [at] haverford.edu (subject: Faculty%20Grant-Seeking%20-%20Funding%20Gained) (Director of Sponsored Research) and/or the hc-aor [at] haverford.edu (subject: Faculty%20Grant-Seeking%20-%20Funding%20Gained) (Associate Provost for Curricular Development and Research) and work with the jgruver [at] haverford.edu (subject: Faculty%20Grant-Seeking%20-%20Funding%20Gained) (Grant and Contracts Accountant) to make the arrangements needed to accept and to administer your award. Your funder will require reports of how you spend the grant in accordance with your proposal, and the results. Although you administer your own award, the selkin [at] haverford.edu (subject: Faculty%20Grant-Seeking%20-%20Funding%20Gained) (Director of Sponsored Research) will provide guidance and remain happy to help.
If you do not gain funding, some funders will make the comments of reviewers available to you. These can be very useful in reformulating your proposal, whether for the same or a different program; even if you choose to try again with a different project, you have still gained important grant writing experience and familiarity with the funding universe.